Wednesday, May 6, 2009

I have just been told Must Never Wear dull colours and churidar kurtas. Ok, so I'll just burn half my wardrobe. I noted with interest that others in the department have been given more damning verdicts. For example, 'Must Never Wear short kurtas and over-tight clothes' always wears short kurtas and over-tight clothes. Well, almost always. She'll have to burn her entire wardrobe barring the stray saree. This is part of an exercise I've started among the girls (how much can you do with a shirt and trousers, so no boys) in my department to get each other to spruce up and fit in with the Lifestyle Etiquette Palette (LEP). Please be honest and write exactly what you think, I told the girls. They did just that. To a T. I don't know about Godesses of Grooming, but I may have created Enemies for Life. I hope not. The Lifestyle group COO, Mala, is adamant on 'looking the part' (meaning must fit into LEP). I agree, to an extent. Of course it may be excessive for the Cosmo Editor to report for work in a thong bikini, but she need not wear shapeless, muddy brown, salwar suits either (she actually wears little black dresses, with cleavage and all, and doesn't even keep pulling at them). It also works wonderfully to have the Harper's Bazaar Editor always (yes always) in dresses, shoes and accessories, all with labels I would wear on my sleeve. She hides them on the undersides. Totally LEP. The thing is, Mala too looks the part. So she keeps the straight face, and makes eye contact when pulling people up for shoddy, horrible-hair, make-up-less turn-outs. I mostly look out of the window, at some unimportant papers on the desk, at my colleagues clothes, intermittently or throughout, when delivering lectures on the subject. Sometimes I make eye-contact and say (sternly lying) I need to do my bit too. In real life, it's more like a big slice. At Good Housekeeping we believe that there is no cutting corners in basic grooming. Honestly, when month after month, we urge our readers to be their best, look their best (look good-feel good), I do feel the guilt weighing me down and rush to the salon for long overdue facials, pedicures, hair trims and so on. Once, I even did a Rs 2,500 super facial which ended with a plastic-y mask freezing over my face. I feared I would suffocate. I didn't, and became radiant. Sadly, I could dazzle only my colleagues (not all) since the day was spent at work. I do think, all of us in office, and most people I know, need to make that extra effort to look their best. It's worth it. And the good part is, it's so do-able now. Do read the Good Looks section in the magazine and tell us if it helps. Till next time.

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi

    I'm a GH reader and thought I'd have a look at your blog since you mentioned it in the Editor's letter for May 09.

    You come across as a warm and down-to-earth person, and I'm sure most GH readers identify with you and have pretty much the same concerns as you do.

    Regarding your latest blog on 6th May, I do not agree at all with the COO Mala Sekhri's views on fitting in with the "Lifestyle etiquette Palate". Organisations come up with these weird concepts from time to time, and it just ends up creating a lot of ill-will between people.

    As a society, today, we pay way too much attention to looks and glamour, rather than what a person really stands for. I firmly believe that as long as you are dressed in clean & tidy clothes, appropritae to the occasion, whether work or play, it shouldn't matter whether your clothes or your look is "trendy" or conforms to comeone else's idea of "looking good". Choosing to wear make-up or not is a personal choice and I don't think anyone, even your boss, has a right to comment on it, unless it is a part of your job to wear make-up (eg. for a model on a shoot).

    I hope Mala reads this comment and realises it's a silly concept that she's started. At the workplace, please judge people on their performance and contribution to the team effort, not on how they look.

    I am sure GH readers will agree with me when I say that we love you and the rest of the GH team for the wonderful issues you put together month after month, not what you wear or how you look!!

    Keep up the good work, I like your blog as well as the magazine, it makes for interesting reading.

    Cheers,
    Khushnaz

    ReplyDelete
  3. hi

    I am the regular reader of GH.

    warm welcome to blog world.

    I write in tamil (mother tongue is telugu)

    I am very proud to say that i am the GH reader.

    mrs.kala sriram

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Khushnaz! Thanks for reading and commenting! Actually, recent research has (sadly, for the likes of me) proved that people who are "well put togehter attractively", also perform better! Of course, our performances are not judged by our looks here but it doesn't hurt our audiences/readers if we look the part.I mean, while the Prevention (the leading health magazine in our group) editor need not be a fashionable diva, it wouldn't do for her to be obese, either! In real life, she has not an ounce of fat and is neatly groomed all the time... Do keep reading and commenting, of course. I love to know your thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sorry forgot to give you the details of the research Khusnaz (you have an unusuallly lovely name), The research was conducted by Professor Gordon Patzer and is tltled The Attractiveness Phenomenon annd shows overwhelmigly that attractive people/well put togehter people perform better(!!)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Manjira

    Thanks on your compliment on my name :-)

    I like your blog, please write more frequently. And thanks for providing the research details, I must read up on it. Seems interesting..... though I still believe that how I look really shouldn't affect my performance!! It just seems soooo unfair!

    Till next time, happy writing.

    Regards,
    Khushnaz

    ReplyDelete
  7. An idea for the GH Team to work on, if you like....

    why don't you guys conduct a similar research on the GH Team to see if the better lookers are better workers as well and publish the results in the magazine? I would be quite eager to read about it.

    Rgds,
    Khushnaz

    ReplyDelete